Guitar Studio: Online Music Academy

Multi-FX vs. Stompboxes: Are Multi-Effects for Lazy Guitarists?

guitar-training-studio-boss-pedal-board

From Stompboxes to Multi-FX: My Journey Through Guitar Effects

When I began playing electric guitar as a teenager, it didn’t take long before I got my first stompbox. At the time, I bought a used Electro-Harmonix Step Stone Flanger from a friend at school for 10 German Marks. I still have this pedal, and now it’s worth a small fortune as a collector’s item! But let’s stay on topic. Soon after, I bought another second-hand pedal: an Ibanez Distortion that had a mind of its own, only turning on or off when it felt like it. Then came a Morley Wah-Fuzz with rust stains and missing screws, and a Boss Chorus that looked like it had survived a heavy battle, among others.

As a teenager, I was thrilled with my pedal setup! It was fantastic to experiment endlessly with the order and settings of effects. It was a lot of fun building sounds, though it was very time-consuming. But honestly, as a teenager with plenty of free time, I had the opportunity to experiment with effects! As I started performing more and transitioned into a professional musician after my higher music studies, I moved into a second phase. I sold most of my stompboxes and bought a high-end multi-FX device from Lexicon, costing around 2000 euros!

At that time, 2000 euros was a small fortune! That device was like heaven on earth. Plugging in my guitar, choosing the right preset, and I sounded like my greatest guitar heroes with minimal effort. However, as I gained more experience as a musician, I entered a third phase. You might guess what happened—I got fed up with it! The multi-FX device was put away, and I started buying high-quality stompboxes again. Back to the basics, and after all, that’s the way I like it (aha aha)! So why did I switch back? What are the pros and cons of stompboxes versus multi-effects?

Why I Switched Back: The Pros and Cons of Multi-FX and Stompboxes

guitar-training-studio-axe-fx-iii

High-quality stompboxes offer a warmer sound but are much more expensive compared to multi-FX devices. However, using individual pedals from different brands allows for more personal customization. Each combination and sequence of pedals creates new dimensions and possibilities for crafting your own unique sound. For instance, do you place the Overdrive before or after the Wah? Should the Compression go before or after the Overdrive? The sky is the limit! This approach encourages creativity and allows you to explore different effects, learning how EQ, delay, gain, reverb, and others should be set to emulate various guitarists. Additionally, stompboxes tend to retain their value better, and some older pedals can even appreciate over time. The major downside is that it’s extremely time-consuming, often involving a tangle of cables and adapters, troubleshooting bad contacts, and a deep understanding of effects.

Fractal Axe-FX

So, what about multi-FX devices? If you see a guitarist with an Axe-FX II, you might think: 1. They’re a wannabe guitarist with a lot of money, 2. They’re an amateur who doesn’t understand how effects work and just bought an Axe-FX II like everyone else, or 3. They’re a professional guitarist who knows what they’re doing and understands when and how to use a multi-FX device. Unfortunately, the first two types are more common in the music scene.

Here’s my take: a multi-FX device is ideal for today’s fast-paced world where convenience often outweighs effort, and quantity and purchase price are prioritized over quality. Multi-FX units usually approximate analog sounds, sometimes up to 99%, but rarely achieve the full analog experience.

On the plus side, multi-FX devices are incredibly easy to use. Need a Santana preset? Connect a USB cable, download the preset, and voilà, you sound like Carlos Santana! Jimi Hendrix? Download and click, and you’ll even find different variations! This convenience is particularly useful for cover bands with varied setlists. Switching from a Metallica song to an Elvis Presley tune, and then moving to Avicii and Kings of Leon, with a multitude of stompboxes would be impractical and negatively impact stage presence. It’s much better to have a guitarist who moves around the stage rather than one constantly fiddling with pedals.

Multi-FX devices also save space, eliminating the need for a heavy pedal case, avoiding issues with bad contacts and broken cables (and identifying which of the 25 patch cables is faulty!), and speeding up the soundcheck process. However, one significant drawback is that multi-FX devices offer a one-size-fits-all approach. If you and I both use the same multi-FX device, we’ll sound alike. While programming can adjust settings, you’re still working within the same set of effects. Creativity is limited, and you can’t easily integrate a pedal from another brand into the setup.

From Digital Convenience to Analog Warmth

guitar-training-studio Music Matthew Bellami

Another example: I recently heard someone rave about guitarist X from cover band Y: “An incredible guitarist! What a sound! When they play a Faith No More song, his guitar sounds just like the original! And when he plays U2, it’s exactly like The Edge!” I was taken aback when I saw in the photo that he was using pre-set patches from an Axe-FX II. Faith No More? Just download the preset. U2? There’s the preset, plug in the USB cable, click, and done. The Edge! Do I have a problem with that? Not at all. The audience doesn’t care, and the guitarist himself probably doesn’t either. What really matters is delivering the songs with the right atmosphere and sound.

However, when it comes to original songs and wanting to stand out, that’s where things can get tricky. Many guitarists using multi-FX units might struggle with recreating specific sounds. Ask them how they achieve the sound of The Edge, and they might have difficulty explaining the details.

Most of these guitarists might barely understand concepts like delay, EQ, compression, and gating. For example, a compressor might be thought of as something for inflating tires, and a gate might be associated with airports! Maybe they don’t care, and I respect that. But it’s a shame that many multi-FX users don’t fully grasp what they’re doing. Crafting a unique sound is an important aspect of playing music and can be quite enjoyable!

Am I against multi-FX devices? Not at all—I use them occasionally myself. The key is context. For original songs with a unique sound, I prefer using stompboxes or a multi-FX device for some extra reverb or delay. When performing with a cover band, I usually opt for a multi-FX device. As a professional musician, I don’t have the time to spend days searching for sounds. Quick setup and sound checks are crucial, and the average audience can’t distinguish between digital and analog.

Additionally, I prefer not to be constantly adjusting knobs on stage. Another drawback of multi-FX devices is their resale value. These devices are essentially computers and often lose value quickly as they become outdated.

In conclusion, it’s definitely not black and white! Decide for yourself what you need and how far your interests extend. And remember, you can always take the best of both worlds!

Stompboxes or Multi-FX? Weighing the Pros and Cons

Stompboxes Pro:

  • Higher resale value
  • Better and warmer sound
  • Customized sound creation
  • Greater creativity—sky is the limit
  • Possibility to combine different types and brands
  • Highly educational
  • Ideal for audiophiles
  • Quality and durability
  • If a pedal fails on stage, the show can continue


Stompboxes Con:

  • High cost for good pedals
  • Cumbersome and time-consuming
  • Can lead to unnecessary delays during performances
  • Numerous circuits and patch cables increase the risk of defects or malfunctions
  • Long signal chains can cause noise and hum
  • Best used with a guitar amplifier


Multi-FX Pro:

  • Quick to assemble and soundcheck
  • Ideal for “lazy” guitarists
  • Easy to download preset sounds
  • More affordable than a collection of quality stompboxes
  • Great for cover bands
  • Suitable for guitarists who place less importance on sound creation
  • Convenient for quick jamming or composing
  • Higher-end multi-FX devices can be connected directly to the PA via DI


Multi-FX Con:

  • Low resale value after a few years
  • Can become outdated quickly
  • One-size-fits-all approach
  • Predominantly digital
  • Limited in custom sound creation
  • Little learning about the workings of effects
  • If a multi-FX device fails on stage, everything might be affected